Negative omega-3 review retracted by journal

Jane Wolfe
1 Min Read

A review by Brian Peskin entitled Why Fish Oil Fails: A Comprehensive 21st Century Lipids-Based Physiologic Analysis has been retracted by the Journal of Lipids after a reader flagged up concerns about the author’s credibility.

Peskin, who has no medical qualifications, wrote: “The promise of fish oil and its so-called active ingredients EPA/DHA fails time and time again in clinical trials. This lipids-based physiologic review will explain precisely why there should have never been expectation for success.”

In the retraction notice, the journal states that the article was retracted “as a result of an undeclared competing interest on the part of the manuscript’s author”.

Paul Peters chief strategic officer of Hindawi, which owns the journal, told the blog Retraction Watch: “In particular, it was found that the author, Brian Peskin, holds a number of patents and is a director of at least one company related to essential fatty acids [Peskin Pharmaceuticals]. Given that essential fatty acids are discussed at length within the retracted article, it was determined that this undeclared conflict of interest was serious enough to warrant retraction.”

Share This Article
Jane Wolfe has worked in journalism since leaving University with a BA (Hons) in English in 1991, covering industries as diverse as energy, broadcasting, wellbeing and animal welfare. She first became part of the Natural Products News team in 1998 as a sub editor and freelance journalist before relocating to Greece in 2004. In 2013 she returned to the magazine as assistant editor, then deputy editor.
Leave a Comment